Mosaic — A DPI Alliance for the Global South
Shared infrastructure belongs to no single institution. That is why it so often goes unbuilt.
Across the Global South, the same problems are solved from first principles in one country after another. Mosaic works on one at a time. It documents the problem, assembles the institutions that can answer it, pilots the answer in a real service, and publishes the result openly — so the next country begins from evidence.
Use cases
The problems are shared. The work has not been.
Each has been documented with the evidence behind it, a design for what shared infrastructure would replace, and the questions that remain unresolved. Open one to see where it stands and what it still requires.
Verifiable Eligibility for Micro-Enterprises
Micro-enterprises prove the same eligibility facts over and over to dozens of disconnected subsidy, credit and grant programs.
See how it could work
AI Translation as Public Infrastructure: A Shared On-Ramp to SATUSEHAT
Clinical notes have to be hand-translated into medical codes before a health record can reach Indonesia's national exchange — and most facilities can't do it.
See how it could work
Selective Disclosure as Public Infrastructure: Verifying the Disability Card at Every Counter
Millions of disability cards are issued, but almost no counter can check one without demanding sensitive personal data in return.
See how it could workHave a stake in one of these, or a fourth problem worth incubating?
Propose a new use caseWhat is Mosaic
An alliance that owns nothing it helps build.
Orchestrates, rather than owns.
Mosaic designs the process and runs the pilot. The infrastructure itself is built by the institutions in the room.
Owns nothing it produces.
Whatever a pilot produces belongs to the institutions running it and to the commons.
Holds no data.
Mosaic designs and evaluates. It never sits in the path of anyone's records.
Verifying who someone is. Checking a qualification. Moving a health record between two providers. These are the same problems in every country, and each country solves them alone. Mosaic works on one at a time, from idea to proof, and publishes the result for the next country to use.
A steering committee decides which problems Mosaic takes on. A small secretariat runs the working groups and does the coordination that no single institution is funded to do — between the institution that owns the problem, the team that can build the answer, and the funder prepared to underwrite the attempt.
How we work
Every problem moves through the same four stages.
Move your cursor over a stage.
Identify
An institution brings a problem it needs to solve. Mosaic documents it with evidence and maps what shared infrastructure could replace.
Convene
Mosaic assembles the institution that owns the problem, the team that can build the answer, and the funder prepared to underwrite it. They agree what would count as success before anything is built.
Pilot
A working version is tested in one real service, before anyone commits to it as policy or as a standard.
Publish
The design, the evaluation and the result are released openly, including where the approach failed, so the next country starts from evidence rather than from scratch.
Publish becomes the next Identify — the cycle repeats.
Why Mosaic exists
Infrastructure built to stay open.
Mosaic exists because shared digital infrastructure — identity, payments, data exchange — too often gets built as somebody's product instead of everybody's foundation. When it stays closed, it serves whoever owns it. When it stays open, it serves everyone who builds on it.
That conviction shapes how Mosaic works: standards that let different systems talk to each other without forcing them to look alike, and nothing recommended as policy until it has been tested in a real service and published as proof.
Infrastructure is a public good.
Digital identity, payments, and data exchange are foundations every person and institution should build on. Open infrastructure serves everyone. Closed infrastructure serves its owner.
Interoperability comes from respecting differences.
The Global South is not a monolith. Mosaic seeks shared standards that let different systems talk — not uniformity. A mosaic is coherent because its pieces are distinct.
Proof before policy.
Mosaic pilots and incubates what it recommends. Every standard it endorses has been tested in a real service. It publishes the results — including where the approach failed.
Updates
Session and findings, recorded as they occur.
Each session, publication and announcement is listed here.
September 2026
The First Convening
The first session brings problem owners, builders, and funders together around the three open use cases. The objective is to fill all three roles on at least one of them, and to agree what a pilot would have to demonstrate.
2 registered
Who can join, and what do you get?
Each stage needs a different kind of partner.
1 / 3 · Partner type
Problem Owners
Governments, institutions, and the people the problem affects.
- What you bring
- A validated public-service problem, the authority to convene around it, and direct knowledge of who the system currently fails.
- What you can contribute
- Share a validated problem, help define acceptable data-sharing and consent rules, and review a pilot’s safeguards before it reaches production.
- What to expect from Mosaic
- A neutral convener, evidence from a real pilot before any policy commitment, and a hearing on consent, privacy and exclusion before launch, not after.
- How to begin
- Name one public-service problem in your sector — or tell us who is currently locked out of it.
Ready to get involved?
Help move a use case from problem to proof.
Bring a real problem, an engineering team, research capacity, or funding — whatever your organisation does best. Every pilot is tested in the open before it becomes policy.
